<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mercurial &#187; android</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mercurial.cc/archives/tag/android/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mercurial.cc</link>
	<description>Weighty, fluid, brilliant and toxic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 05:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Phone rumours</title>
		<link>http://www.mercurial.cc/archives/2009/12/17/google-phone-rumours/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mercurial.cc/archives/2009/12/17/google-phone-rumours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Camilo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mercurial.cc/?p=2499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ohh that it were true! Thee are rumours about a new Google phone coming out in January for only $99, and although pure speculation  it makes my mouth water in anticipation.</p>
<p>Gizmodo actually has a good point: Google would be protecting the brand from fragmentation, ensuring that the Android remains fully functional:</p>
<p>Sold without a carrier, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohh that it were true! Thee are rumours about a new Google phone coming out in January for only $99, and although pure <a href="http://www.androidguys.com/2009/12/14/reuters-nexus-one-available-directly-through-google-website-january-5/" title="gphone">speculation </a> it makes my mouth water in anticipation.</p>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5427938/how-carriers-and-phone-makers-are-strangling-android-and-googles-plan-to-save-it" title="protecting the brand">Gizmodo</a> actually has a good point: Google would be protecting the brand from fragmentation, ensuring that the Android remains fully functional:</p>
<blockquote><p>Sold without a carrier, software updates for the Nexus One will be in Google&#8217;s hands. They will be able to keep it up to date as Android develops, without having to depend on some other company—or companies—not to drop the ball.</p></blockquote>
<p>The good part would be that, by creating a loss leader such as that, they will be generating a new generation of google users, with complete integration over the phone. </p>
<p>And, quoting <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/aexhb/google_phone_199_without_contract99_for_google/c0h8foc">reddit</a>: &#8220;google just accidentally the whole cell phone industry.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mercurial.cc/archives/2009/12/17/google-phone-rumours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
